Palestinian ‘invasion Essay Example for Free

Palestinian ‘invasion Essay Since December 1, 2004, out of the 1085 Times’ columns, 37 percent of them talked about Palestinian ‘invasion(s)’, 36 percent mentioned ‘terrorism’, 28 percent talked about ‘terrorist(s)’, 21 percent brought up Palestinian ‘violence’ , 18 percent cited ‘suicide bombing(s)’, 16 percent stated Palestinian ‘weapon(s)’ and 14 percent of them cited Palestinian ‘radicals’. On the contrary to this strong Israeli account, only two words mirroring a Palestinian plot come into view in an equivalent proportion of Times’ columns. Israeli â€Å"settlement(s)† were cited in 32 percent of articles and Israeli â€Å"occupation† was cited in only 16 percent of columns. This one-sidedness is even more arresting because the stress on Palestinian violence heard from last two and a half years time during which Israelis murdered 965 Palestinians, above half of the city dwellers, while Palestinians killed only 85 Israelis . However, Israeli ‘attacks(s)’ are cited in 13 percent of Times columns and Israeli ‘violence’ in only 4 percent. Ethan Bronner recently expressed his viewpoint at the back of The Times’ staged tilt towards a right-wing Israeli-US account. In mocking Jimmy Carter’s latest best-selling volume, Bronner said: â€Å"the never-ending disgrace of everyday life for the Palestinians under Israeli occupation† as â€Å"particularly since Israels exits from Southern Lebanon and Gaza have not closed anti-Israel hostility from those regions†, and since â€Å"for the most radical heads of the Muslim world†¦ resolving the Israel issue†¦ means getting rid of Israel. † However, Bronner’s assertion that a stress on Palestinian and Muslim violent behavior and extremism is required by recent actions is contradicted by the truth that the Times approach isn’t a newly-fangled one, but stands for a business as normal, mirroring the similar orientalist portrayal of Arabs and Muslims drawn by Edward Sa’id in 1978. An example of other Times’ columns from the last weeks offers solid cases of the biased coverage behind the stories. A columnist Isabel Kershner noted in the beginning sentences of her article â€Å"Israel and Palestinians Trade Fire in Gaza and West Bank† (April 22, 2007) that: â€Å"A sharp rise of Israeli-Palestinian fighting in the West Bank and Gaza left up to six Palestinians deceased and ended in Israeli air strikes into Gaza. † Although 6 Palestinians were murdered inside the West Bank and Gaza, with five deaths definitively credited to the Israeli armed forces, with no Israeli damages reported, the column captioned a swap over of blaze. Kershner’s beginning precis sentence didn’t point out the â€Å"violence† or even intensification to Israel, nor did she make use of the word â€Å"attack† to explain Israeli events. Even more odd, of the column’s 851 words in total, 524 words were dedicated to reciting a Palestinian â€Å"attack† on a confidential ‘American School for Palestinians in Gaza’ during which the invaders, â€Å"Islamic extremists† ruined school property, but no one got injuries. So Israeli soldiers, who slaughtered 6 Palestinians, didn’t assault and got less reporting than Palestinian extremists who assailed, though they injure not a soul. Well-known Israeli reporter Amira Hass has said: â€Å"What newspaper writing is truly about – its to keep a close eye on power and the centers of power. † The New York Times has been unsuccessful in attaining that idyllic model, not simply in coverage of Iraq, but also in reporting on Israelis and Palestinians conflict. Sooner than any perception of impartiality, balance or truth, the Times replicates as a substitute the inequity of authority between Israel and Palestine, highlighting the outlooks of the influential players – the Israelis and US administrations. Palestinians’ lived episodes – that they are beleaguered, being murdered, on the breadline, having their property seized, deprived of their human rights and the sufferers of a biased system – are masked by the drumming of ‘Palestinian terrorism’, even when hardly ever Israeli soldiers are being murdered. Similarly with Iraq, this chauvinistic story of inborn Arab bloodshed is being browbeaten to give good reasons for dominance of one people by another. Lacking this investigation, Bill Moyers’ â€Å"Buying the War† stands for only a primary step towards revealing US media bias in coverage of the Middle East. References: Edward Said. â€Å"Orientalism†. New York: Vintage Books. 1978. Kershner, Isabel. â€Å"Israel Says Hamas Was Plotting Terrorist Attacks†. The New York Times, April 11, 2007. 12 May 2007